Search form

Employer Pay Obligations in Face of Disasters

By Richard I. Greenberg and Daniel J. Jacobs
  • October 31, 2012

When unexpected natural disasters, such as Hurricane Sandy, impact an employer’s ability to operate business as usual, employers are faced with last-minute decisions to close all or part of their operations or otherwise modify work schedules.  An initial consideration for all employers is whether the employer has an obligation to pay its employees if they are unable to work due to the event.

With respect to non-exempt employees, there is generally no obligation under federal law or state law to pay for time not worked.  However, under certain state laws, employers may have an obligation to compensate non-exempt employees under call-in/reporting pay laws, especially if the employees were not advised that they should not report to work and were denied work upon arrival at the workplace.  Employers must become familiar with such laws and exceptions contained therein.   If there is an applicable payment obligation, it varies by state.  For example, non-exempt employees in New Jersey who report to work by request or permission of the employer must be paid for one hour at the applicable wage rate whether or not work is furnished, unless the employer has made available to the employee the minimum number of hours agreed by the employer and employee prior to the commencement of work on the day involved. 

As to salaried exempt employees who federal law mandates must be paid on a "salary basis," employers may not make salary deductions for absences that result from an employer’s partial-week closing of operations, including closings due to weather-related emergencies or disasters. Accordingly, absent any other permissible deduction, exempt employees must be paid their full salary if they perform any work in a workweek and only miss work time due to the employer's closure of operations.  Closures for a full workweek need not be paid if no work is performed.  

As a preventive measure, in anticipation of any potential emergencies, employers should establish procedures for communicating with employees regarding emergency closure and modified operations. Further, employers should consider whether they will mandate or permit use of accrued vacation or paid time off and whether their policies and applicable state law permit them to do so.  With exempt employees, using paid vacation or paid time off generally resolves any issues related to "salary basis" compliance.  However, employers should be careful when charging an employee's vacation or paid time off banks if the employee may have performed work from home during the closure. 

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist with this and other workplace issues.

©2012 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

February 20, 2018

Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Insurance Company is Not ‘Financial Institution’ in Garnishment Law

February 20, 2018

An insurance company named as a garnishee in a garnishment action is not a “financial institution” under Georgia’s garnishment statute when the garnishment is seeking earnings owed to its current or former employees. May 2016 Amendment Apparently responding to a federal judge’s 2015 ruling that portions of Georgia’s post-judgment... Read More

February 7, 2018

Déjà Vu: Implications of a Government Shutdown on Federal Contractors

February 7, 2018

For the second time in a month, for lack of agreement on funding the government long-term, we face the specter of a government shutdown. The government shutdown that began on January 20, 2018, lasted three days. Congress ended that shutdown after voting on a stopgap measure to fund the government until February 8, 2018. As that date... Read More

January 29, 2018

Fitness Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2018

January 29, 2018

Welcome to our premiere issue! Our goal is to keep fitness industry clients and contacts informed about employment and labor law issues that may affect your organizations. We hope you find this newsletter valuable and invite you to share it with interested colleagues and contacts. In this issue, we provide a brief summary of hot... Read More

Related Practices