Search form

Federal Appeals Court Finds Charge Nurses Are Supervisors

By Roger P. Gilson Jr.
  • June 25, 2000

Charge nurses at a suburban New York nursing home are supervisors and should not have been included in two separate bargaining units sought by a union. The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (New York) ruled that the charge nurses met the statutory definition of supervisor because they had the authority to responsibly direct other employees "in the interest of the employer."

The facility's nurse managers handle the nursing department administration and report to the assistant director of nursing. The charge nurses consist of registered nurses and licensed practical nurses, and they report to the nurse managers. One charge nurse and one regular nurse are assigned to each floor for each shift; the charge nurses are responsible for providing necessary patient care, assisting the certified nurse assistants, and monitoring overall care.

In reviewing the supervisory duties of the charge nurses, the appeals court found that they responsibly directed certified nurse assistants and exercised independent judgment in doing so. Indeed, charge nurses had been disciplined for failing to direct staff properly in their patient care duties, and the court reasoned that accountability for another's failure to act established the requisite supervisory authority. Accordingly, the charge nurses were excluded from the bargaining units, relieving the employer from the duty to bargain with one of those units. [Schnurmacher Nursing Home v. NLRB, No. 98-4388 (2nd Cir., 2000).]

©2000 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

May 20, 2019

Labor Board General Counsel’s Review of Employer Work Rules a Mixed Bag

May 20, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) General Counsel (GC) has issued an Advice Memorandum on whether unfair labor practice charges alleging four employer rules violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) have merit. In a Memorandum released on March 14, 2019, the GC concluded that the employer’s dress-code, confidential-... Read More

May 17, 2019

A Numbers Game: Labor Board Rules on Successor Employer’s Bargaining Obligation

May 17, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held that an operator of a unionized nursing home pursuant to a lease agreement with the former owner and operator was a successor employer under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), despite the fact that a majority of its bargaining unit employees did not come from the bargaining unit of... Read More

May 15, 2019

Top Five Labor Law Developments for April 2019

May 15, 2019

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Peter Robb urges the Board to return to its traditional joint-employer standard. In a brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on April 17 and released on April 29, Robb stated his belief that the Court exceeded its authority in December 2018, when it... Read More

Related Practices