Search form

High Court's Ruling in Arbitration Case Impacts EPLI Community

  • April 1, 2001

Employment practices insurance will be significantly impacted by a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court upholding agreements which require employees to arbitrate any employment disputes, rather than sue in court. The ruling provides an incentive for employers - and insurers writing EPL coverages - to manage more effectively the risk of costly litigation by implementing mandatory arbitration agreements, as well as other alternative dispute resolution procedures ("ADR"). Certainly, claims personnel always should ascertain whether the insured has in place ADR mechanisms - including mandatory arbitration - once a claim is received.

The Court's Decision....

The U.S. Supreme Court has made it easier for employers to resolve workplace disputes through the use of arbitration procedures rather than the courts. In ruling on March 21st that employment agreements containing arbitration provisions are enforceable under federal law, the Supreme Court settled conflicting opinions among the lower courts as to whether employers could require employees to submit disputes to arbitration rather than file lawsuits. Employers now have a reliable alternative to courtroom litigation as a means to redress employee complaints. [Circuit City Stores,Inc.v.Adams,532 U.S.____ (2001)].

Jackson Lewis drafted a "friend of the court" brief on behalf of the Society for Human Resource Management which helped convince the 5-4 majority to rule in favor of arbitration. While highly unusual, the Court specifically referred to the various amicus briefs in its decision. Although the Supreme Court now has said arbitration agreements are enforceable, it did not address the practical issues regarding implementation. Employers wishing to construct these agreements must be very careful in how they draft them, because the lower courts have been deeply troubled by arbitration processes that are one-sided. The Supreme Court did not address the details.

Considerations And Implications For EPLI Carriers And Employers

In the wake of the Circuit City ruling, employers now should be evaluating the pros and cons of arbitration to decide whether it is right for their workplace. There are, in fact, a number of points favoring arbitration over courtroom litigation:

  1. disputes may be resolved more quickly and efficiently;
  2. proceeding through arbitration is generally less costly;
  3. arbitrators are believed to be "expert" decision-makers bringing specific knowledge and experience to the table, as opposed to lay jurors;
  4. arbitration may provide a "user friendly" vehicle for both employee and employer; and
  5. arbitration may provide a system that insures fairness and due process.

Of course there are employer concerns, for example:

  1. a fear of proliferation of employee disputes;
  2. the difficulty of overturning an arbitrator's unfavorable decision;
  3. a tendency among arbitrators to "split the baby" to resolve the dispute; and
  4. inclusion of evidence that normally would be excluded from a court proceeding.

Nonetheless, ADR has been given a tremendous impetus by the Court's recent ruling. As part of an overall risk management program, insurers may consider reductions in premiums/retentions for EPL insureds who adopt mandatory ADR procedures.

©2001 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.'s 950+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients' goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee. For more information, visit