Search form

More ADA Cases on Supreme Court Slate for 2001-2002

By Francis P. Alvarez
  • January 8, 2002

In addition to the case decided on January 8 involving an employee with carpal tunnel syndrome, the U. S. Supreme Court is expected to issue rulings in two more cases involving claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act before it concludes its current term at the end of June, 2002.

Those cases involve two other major aspects of the federal disability discrimination law:

  1. does the ADA require an employer to make a "reasonable accommodation" if to do so would violate an existing bona fide seniority system (US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett, Docket No. 00-1250);
  2. does the ADA allow an employer to exclude from a particular job a disabled worker who faces a potential threat to his own health or safety but does not pose a "direct threat" to anyone else in the workplace (Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal, Docket No. 00-1406).

In the first case, the justices will attempt to strike a balance between the ADA's mandate that employers make reasonable accommodations for otherwise qualified individuals and a valid seniority system, which otherwise would prohibit such actions. The second case will test the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's interpretation of whether the "direct threat" defense applies to an individual who poses a danger only to himself and not to other co-workers. That defense enables an employer to take adverse employment action against an individual who might otherwise be protected by the ADA.

For more information, please visit the U. S. Supreme Court website.

©2002 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

October 25, 2019

Election Day is Coming – What are Your Obligations as an Employer?

October 25, 2019

With Election Day fast approaching, employers should ensure they are in compliance with state law requirements related to employee voting rights. While not all states impose requirements on employers, some impose time off obligations and notice requirements with the possibility of criminal or civil penalties for non-compliance.... Read More

October 21, 2019

FMCSA Clearinghouse Opened, Transportation Department Announces

October 21, 2019

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Clearinghouse registration, which is the electronic database that will contain information about commercial motor vehicle drivers’ drug and alcohol program violations, is open, the agency has announced. The Clearinghouse will become operational on... Read More

October 4, 2019

New Connecticut Law Requires Policy on Opioid Antagonists at Colleges, Universities

October 4, 2019

Connecticut has enacted changes to its opioid laws that include requiring institutions of higher education to implement a policy on the availability and use of opioid antagonists for students and staff. Public Act No. 19-191, “An Act Addressing Opioid Use,” makes various other revisions to the state’s opioid use prevention and... Read More