Search form

OSHA's New Ergonomics Program Standard

  • January 30, 2001

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has issued its long-awaited final rule for an Ergonomics Program Standard, 29 CFR Part 1910.900. This new standard contains stringent requirements for most non-construction employers to identify and abate musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The costs to implement the ergonomics requirements may be significant and, in some cases, result in severe financial hardship.

In the final rule are some surprising components that were not contained in the proposed rule. For instance, full implementation of the required program is now triggered by the activation of defined "action triggers" for at least one of five specified MSD "risk factors." Also, the final rule contains substantially expanded provisions addressing an employee's right to dispute the findings of the initially consulted health care professional (HCP). Employers now face the possibility and expense of as many as three separate HCP evaluations regarding an alleged MSD.

One of the chief criticisms of the new standard is its potential for saddling employers with responsibility for MSDs that are not caused by the job. MSDs are defined as "work-related" disorders. However, the standard does not necessarily exclude the potential for an MSD to become "work-related" where circumstances outside the employer's control, such as personal activities like tennis or weight lifting, or personal attributes, such as obesity, are contributing factors.

The new standard became effective on January 14, 2001. The following summary prepared by the Jackson Lewis OSHA practice group will assist health care employers in understanding their new ergonomics obligations.

Scope of the Standard

Which jobs are covered?

The standard applies to all general industry jobs, including those in the health care services field. Although the final standard has a broader application, the requirement for full implementation of the entire ergonomics program now depends entirely upon the actual report of, or of the signs and symptoms of, an MSD. Until such an occurrence, the final rule only requires employers to provide all employees with initial, basic information addressing recognition and reporting of MSDs.

What is a Musculoskeletal Disorder?

The standard defines MSDs as a disorder of the muscles, nerves, tendons, ligaments, joints, cartilage, blood vessels, or spinal discs affecting the neck, shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, hand, abdomen (hernia only), back, knee, ankle, and foot. Excluded are injuries arising from slips, trips, falls, motor vehicle accidents, or blunt trauma.

Examples of MSDs identified by OSHA include muscle strains and tears, ligament sprains, joint and tendon inflammation, pinched nerves, and spinal disc degeneration. The final rule also states that MSD injuries may be manifested by medical diagnoses of low back pain, tension neck syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, rotator cuff syndrome, DeQuervain's syndrome, trigger finger, tarsal tunnel syndrome, sciatica, epicondylitis, tendinitis, Raynaud's phenomenon, hand-arm vibration syndrome, carpet layer's knee, and herniated spinal disc.

MSDs most often develop as a result of repeated exposure to MSD "risk factors," however, exposure to only one MSD risk factor may be enough to cause an MSD. The standard identifies five such risk factors, which are defined in terms of "action triggers" based upon duration of exposure to specified actions or conditions. These risk factors are:

  • Repetition
  • Force
  • Awkward Postures
  • Contact stress
  • Vibration

What is the first action employers must take?

The standard imposes one initial responsibility on all covered employers: to supply all employees with basic MSD information. This information must educate employees regarding the common MSDs and their signs and symptoms, as well as the kinds of jobs and activities associated with MSD hazards. Employees must receive information on how to report MSDs, with an emphasis on the importance of prompt reporting and the consequences of delayed reporting. Employees also must receive a summary of the OSHA standard. Current employees must receive this initial training within 11 months after the standard's publication date, and new hires within 14 days of hiring. This information also must be conspicuously posted.

When must full implementation of the entire ergonomics program occur?

The final rule requires employers to conduct a prompt investigation upon receiving any employee report of signs and symptoms of an MSD. If the report involves an event or condition that qualifies as an "MSD incident," as defined by the standard, and if any of the five MSD risk factors are manifested in the associated job function in excess of a specified "action trigger" threshold, the employer must then implement the complete ergonomics program. In some cases, employers may be able to avoid full implementation if they qualify for the standard's "Quick Fix" option.

What is an "action trigger"?

The final rule contains a "Basic Screening Tool" that establishes defined thresholds, or "action triggers," for each of five primary MSD risk factors. If the job involves any of the activities specified in the Basic Screening Tool in excess of the maximum duration established for the activity, employers must proceed with a detailed evaluation -- a "job hazard analysis." The results of this evaluation determine whether or not there is a "problem job," i.e., a job that poses a potential MSD hazard.

Regardless of the results of the job hazard analysis, the employer will have to fully implement an ergonomics program (absent availability of the "Quick Fix" option). The job hazard analysis only determines the scope of implementation. If there is a problem job, all employees in that job must be included in the program. Otherwise, the employer may limit implementation to the employee involved in the MSD incident.

What are the primary elements of a complete ergonomics program?

Listed below are the primary elements of a complete ergonomics program:

  1. management leadership;
  2. employee participation;
  3. MSD management;
  4. job hazard analysis;
  5. hazard reduction and control;
  6. training.

The "Quick Fix" option may be available as an alternative to implementation of the full program under certain conditions. If the employer is eligible to utilize this option, the employer must take steps to eliminate or reduce the identified MSD hazard within 90 days according to specific criteria set out in the standard.

Management Leadership

This program element measures the employer's dedication to an effective program. To meet this obligation the employer must:

  1. assign and communicate the responsibilities for setting up and managing the program;
  2. ensure each responsible person has the necessary authority, resources, and information to meet assigned responsibilities;
  3. ensure company practices encourage, and do not discourage, prompt reporting of MSDs and employee participation in the program;
  4. periodically communicate with employees about the program and any employee MSD concerns. 

Employee Participation

This program element reflects OSHA's firm belief that employee interest and involvement are vital to the success of the ergonomics program. It is based on the premise that employees have the most direct interest in their own safety and health on the job and that they have an in-depth knowledge of the operations and tasks they perform.

To comply with this program element, employers must establish mechanisms for employee reporting of MSDs, respond promptly to employee reports, and involve employees in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the program. (Such participation, however, must be consistent with limitations on the use of labor management committees imposed by the National Labor Relations Act, according to the Preamble to the proposed rule). Employees must also receive a summary of the requirements of the standard and have ready access to the standard, the employer's program, and general MSD information. 

MSD Management 

The term "MSD management" refers to the employer's collective obligations to employees who have sustained a confirmed MSD injury. In addition to appropriate temporary work restrictions, this obligation includes ensuring employees receive prompt and effective medical evaluation and follow-up of their MSD and recovery by a health care professional (HCP), all at no cost to the employee. The final rule provides an affected employee with the right to obtain a second and even a third HCP opinion, if necessary, regarding his or her condition, all at the employer's expense. This last provision was entirely absent from the proposed rule. 

MSD management also includes the requirement for "work restriction protection" (WRP) for up to 90 days. Basically, WRP means maintaining 100% of wages for employees assigned to light duty, or 90% o f wages where total removal from the work place occurs. WRP also guarantees no reduction in employment rights or benefits, including seniority, insurance programs, or retirement and savings plans.

Job Hazard Analysis 

This element is the core of the ergonomics program. If an action trigger is activated, job hazard analysis is the step that determines whether or not the employer has a "problem job" on his hands. This determination is not a simple matter. OSHA has incorporated by reference several professional treatises, studies, and papers that address detailed methods for ergonomic analysis of work functions. These are referred to as "hazard identification tools." Appendix D-1 to the standard provides some information about these incorporated "tools," but employers will have to obtain their own copies to determine how to use these resources in a job hazard analysis. (Appendix D-2 is a self-contained "occupation-specific" hazard identification tool respecting VDT workstations.) Employers also have the option of retaining the services of trained ergonomics professionals, or using any other "reasonable" method that is appropriate to the job and relevant to the specific risk factors. 

Hazard Reduction and Control 

This element refers to the employer's obligation to eliminate or materially reduce the identified hazards to the extent feasible, using engineering, administrative and/or work practice controls, and as a last resort, personal protective equipment (excluding back belts/braces and waist braces/splints). In other words, this element constitutes the acceptable goals of an ergonomics program. 

In the standard, the word "control" is a term of art that effectively means complete elimination of a hazard. Absent complete control, identified hazards must be reduced to acceptable levels as defined by the hazard identification tools in Appendix D. Accomplishing either of these goals eventually may permit the employer to reduce the scope of its ergonomics program to the maintenance of controls and related training necessary to prevent a recurrence of the MSD. If neither preferred goal is achievable, the employer must reduce the hazard to the extent feasible and reassess the situation every three years to determine whether new solutions may be available. 

Training 

As discussed above, all employees must receive basic MSD training. However, more detailed and specific training is required for employees in jobs where the action trigger has been activated, for their supervisors and team leaders, and for the employees involved in the set up and continuing management of the program. This focused training must include a reemphasis of the MSD basic training, supplemented with informa tion about specific MSD hazards and risk factors present in the relevant job. The training must also address the employer's ergonomics program and the roles the respective trainees play in the program. Finally, the training must include details about the employer's plan and timetable for correction of the hazards, as well as instruction regarding the employee's role in evaluating the effectiveness of the chosen controls. 

Program Evaluation 

Employers have a basic obligation to evaluate the ergonomics program periodically, i.e., at least every three years, to ensure it is effective and in compliance with the standard. 

This means consulting with employees in the program to assess their views on the program's effectiveness and to identify any deficiencies; evaluating the elements of the program to be sure they are functioning properly; and ensuring that the program is achieving positive results, i.e., eliminating or materially reducing MSD hazards. 

Recordkeeping 

Employers are required to keep records if they have 11 or more employees, including part-time or temporary employees. Records that must be kept by the employer are: 

  1. employee reports and employer responses;
  2. job hazard analyses;
  3. hazard control records;
  4. quick fix control records;
  5. ergonomics program evaluations; and
  6. MSD management records (work restrictions, time off, HCP opinions). 

These records must be made available to employees, their designated representatives, and OSHA representatives upon appropriate request. In most cases, records must be kept for three years. 

Sanctions and Penalties 

As with all alleged violations of safety and health standards, OSHA can issue proposed penalties as part of the citation process. Penalties can range from zero for "other than serious" violations, to $7,000 per violation for "serious" violations, and up to $70,000 per violation for willful or repeat violations. 

Editor's Note: Health care employers may be particularly hard hit by the ergonomics standard requirements. In the health care sector, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports there were nearly 90,000 MSDs resulting in days away from work in 1998. Almost 15% of MSDs in private industry occurred in the health care sector -- largely in hospitals and nursing homes, and often due to lifting and moving patients. Witnesses at OSHA's public hearings on the ergonomics standard testified that as many as 75% of sonography technicians doing ultrasound suffer from MSDs. OSHA estimates that workers' compensation for MSDs in the health sector cost $2.8 billion in 1996, with total indirect costs estimated to be about $5.8 billion. 

It is unclear what impact this new standard will have on other federal or state laws, such as the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, or state worker's compensation statutes. It is also unclear whether employees will be able to claim retaliation under Section 11(c) of the Act for denial of work removal protection in violation of the standard. Further, it should be noted that there is a move in Congress to overturn the new standard.


 

©2001 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

September 26, 2019

An Aging Construction Workforce: Recognition and Response

September 26, 2019

The number of workers aged 55 and over is increasing, while the number of workers under the age of 25 is decreasing, according to the 2018 Current Population Survey. The construction industry may feel this more acutely than other industries, as workers in the construction industry tend to be older than those in other industries, the... Read More

August 21, 2019

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Agency Proposes Changes to Hours of Service Rules for Truck Drivers

August 21, 2019

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on changes to the hours of service (HOS) rules. Background First adopted in 1937, FMCSA’s HOS rules set the permitted operating hours of commercial drivers. FMCSA mandated use of... Read More

June 25, 2019

The Aging Construction Industry: Keeping Skilled Employees Longer

June 25, 2019

Workers in the construction industry tend to be older than those in other industries, according to the National Association of Home Builders. The median age of construction workers is 42 years old, a year older than the median in the national labor force. Further, the median age of workers in the industry is 44-45 years old in several U.... Read More

Related Practices