Search form

President's Order Prompts Labor Board to Issue Guidelines on Objections to Use of Union Dues

By Roger P. Gilson Jr.
  • April 6, 2001

An Executive Order signed by President George W. Bush on February 17 has prompted the National Labor Relations Board to issue guidelines about employee rights to object to the use of union dues for political and other non-representational purposes. Among other things, the Executive Order directs federal contractors and their subcontractors to post a workplace notice informing employees who are covered by a union security clause about their rights under federal labor law to object to certain uses of union dues. Employees covered by union security clauses who have chosen not to become union members may object to the use of their union dues for activities unrelated "collective bargaining, contract administration, or grievance adjustments." In the notice, employees are instructed to contact the Labor Board for more information.

The guidelines cite the U. S. Supreme Court's ruling in Communication Workers of America v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988), that a union is obligated to "provide notice to nonmember employees of their Beck rights; to refrain from charging objectors for nonrepresentational expenses; to provide objectors with a financial disclosure; and to establish procedures for objectors to challenge the accuracy of the union's disclosure." Included in the guidelines is a series of typical questions and answers which Board agents may be asked by individuals inquiring about their Beck rights. For a copy of the NLRB guidelines and the Executive Order, visit the NLRB's website.

©2001 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

August 21, 2019

Labor Board Corrects ‘Unjustified Asymmetry’ in Anticipatory Withdrawal of Union Recognition Doctrine

August 21, 2019

Since 2001, an employer presented with evidence that at least 50 percent of its unionized bargaining unit no longer wanted to be represented by the union could anticipatorily withdraw recognition from that union. The union, however, could rebut that evidence by showing that, subsequent to the employer’s pronouncement and prior to the... Read More

August 20, 2019

Supreme Court’s Epic Systems Decision on Arbitration Interpreted Broadly by Labor Board

August 20, 2019

An employer may lawfully issue to its employees a new or revised mandatory arbitration agreement containing a class- and collective-action waiver specifying that employment disputes are to be resolved by individualized arbitration, even if it was in response to employees opting into a collective action (such as a wage lawsuit), the... Read More

August 15, 2019

Top Five Labor Law Developments for July 2019

August 15, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel’s Division of Advice has found an employer did not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it fired an employee based on the mistaken belief that she divulged confidential wage information. Centura, 27-CA-234214 (Adv. Mem. June 24, 2019, released July 16, 2019). As... Read More

Related Practices