Search form

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Attorneys' Fees Are Income and Reportable on Claimant's Federal Tax Return

By Bruce H. Schwartz
  • February 15, 2005

In a unanimous decision, the U. S. Supreme Court has ruled that attorneys fees paid out of a judgment or settlement under a contingent fee agreement are includible in claimant's gross income for federal tax purposes. Both cases under consideration by the Court involved claims arising out of the employment relationship. The ruling ends conflict among the federal appeals courts over whether the position taken by the Internal Revenue Service regarding the tax treatment of such contingency fees was correct. [Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Banks, consolidated with Commission of Internal Revenue Banaitis, 543 U.S. ____ (Docket Nos. 03-892 03-907, January 24, 2005).]

Federal appeals courts in the 5th, 6th and 11th circuits had ruled that the contingency fees portion of judgments and settlements was not includable in the recipient's gross income. The federal appeals court in the 9th circuit had applied state law giving a plaintiff's attorney a special property interest in such fee arrangements. These rulings were in disagreement with the position of the federal appeals courts in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 10th and Federal Circuits, as well as the U.S. Tax Court and IRS, on the includability of attorney contingency fees in claimants' gross income.

As a result of the Supreme Court's ruling on January 24, 2005, the attorneys' fees portion of any settlement or judgment is taxable income to the recipient whether the fees have been paid directly to the claimant or directly to the attorney, and whether the fees are pursuant to a contingent fee or other agreement. The amount of the fees is reportable on IRS form 1099-MISC to be issued to the claimant. If the fees are paid directly to the attorney, a separate form 1099-MISC must be issued to the attorney, in addition to the one issued to the claimant.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 created a new provision in the Tax Code, effective October 22, 2004, that allows the claimant to deduct 100% of the fees payment on his or her federal income tax return. This provision is not retroactive and did not apply to the cases decided by the Supreme Court.

For questions concerning these decisions and their application, please contact the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work, or the Benefits Practice Group coordinators, Michael Jacobster or Bruce Schwartz.

©2005 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

May 15, 2019

EPLI Trends, Sexual Harassment Claims, and Planning for 2019

May 15, 2019

As workplace laws continue to evolve, the potential risk exposure is increasing. Jackson Lewis prepared this trends overview to help assess the current workplace law landscape in the #MeToo era and the wave of agency charges, latest claims, and new laws.  Highlights include: Pay Equity Lawsuits: The Next Wave of Litigation... Read More

May 7, 2019

Kentucky Employers Must Be Represented by Counsel in Unemployment Compensation Hearings, Court Rules

May 7, 2019

Non-lawyers may no longer represent employers in unemployment compensation hearings in Kentucky, the Kentucky Court of Appeals has ruled. Nichols v. Kentucky Unemployment Commission, et al., No. 2017-CA-001156-MR, 2019 Ky. App. LEXIS 73 (Ky Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2019). The Court held the section of the Kentucky unemployment compensation... Read More

April 24, 2019

U.S. Supreme Court: Employment Class Arbitration Must Be Expressly Addressed in Contract

April 24, 2019

Class action arbitration is such a departure from ordinary, bilateral arbitration of individual disputes that courts may compel class action arbitration only where the parties expressly declare their intention to be bound by such actions in their arbitration agreement, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-4 decision. Lamps Plus, Inc.... Read More

Related Practices