Search form

Labor Department Independent Contractors Guidance Targets Home Care, Nursing, Caregiver Registries

By Patrick O. Peters
  • August 6, 2018

In its first substantive guidance on independent contractors, the Trump Administration has targeted misclassification in the healthcare industry.

The Department of Labor (DOL) issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2018-4 (“Determining Whether Nurse or Caregiver Registries Are Employers of the Caregiver”) on July 13, 2018, to provide guidance to Wage and Hour Division (WHD) field staff on determining whether home care, nurse, or caregiver registries are employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

A registry is an entity that matches people who need caregiver services with caregivers who can provide those services.

Administrator’s Interpretations Withdrawn

The Obama Administration DOL issued Administrator’s Interpretations (AI) on independent contractors in July 2015 and on determining joint employment in January 2016. Current Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta announced the withdrawal of these in June 2017 in a three-sentence press release. Both AIs were criticized by employers for their significant shift in longstanding wage and hour law and for creating standards without the formal notice-and-comment process. The DOL did not replace these AIs with any other guidance at the time.


In Bulletin No. 2018-4, the DOL points out that its current position is “[c]onsistent with WHD’s longstanding position” that a registry that simply matches clients and caregivers is not an employer under the FLSA. Additionally, the Bulletin reiterates the traditional “economic reality” test used by the WHD and notes that no single factor about the relationship may conclusively determine whether an employment relationship exists.

The underlying theme of the Bulletin is that registries may avoid being considered an employer by limiting the amount of control they have over the caregiver and by maintaining minimal interference with the caregiver-client relationship. To aid in interpreting what factors are to be considered, the Bulletin lists specific examples that may be relevant to the analysis.

Factors to be considered include:

  • Background and Reference Checks – Registries often conduct background and reference checks on caregivers, but performing basic or legally required checks does not by itself indicate an employee-employer relationship. On the other hand, if a registry is screening by using subjective criteria to select the caregiver, it may indicate the registry is the caregiver’s employer.
  • Hiring and Firing – If a registry merely introduces a caregiver who meets the parameters and preferences of a client, but does not maintain the ability to hire or fire the caregiver, then the registry likely is not an employer of the caregiver.
  • Scheduling and Assigning Work – Typically, after a registry has facilitated an introduction, the caregiver and client are left to determine the work schedules and assignments. A registry’s exercise of control over the caregiver’s work schedules and assignments may indicate the registry is an employer of the caregiver.
  • Controlling the Caregiver’s Work – While the registry may seek information concerning the care the client needs for matching purposes, the registry may not instruct the caregiver on how to care for clients. Indications that the registry is the caregiver’s employer is requiring the caregiver to call only the registry if the caregiver will be late or miss a shift and disciplining the caregiver.
  • Setting the Pay Rate – The caregiver typically negotiates the rate of pay directly with the client rather than with the registry. Alternatively, Medicaid or another government program may determine the rate of pay. In either case, that the registry is not determining the caregiver’s rate of pay indicates the registry is not the caregiver’s employer.
  • Continuous Payments for Caregiving Services – The registry may perform and charge for functions such as payroll and producing tax documents, but this does not indicate the registry is the caregiver’s employer. If the registry charges based on the number of hours the caregiver works, this indicates an ongoing interest in the employment relationship and may indicate the registry is the caregiver’s employer.
  • Paying Wages – While providing payroll services does not indicate the registry is the caregiver’s employer, a registry’s direct payment of its own funds to the caregiver may.
  • Tracking Hours – A registry may collect time sheets. This is not an indication of the existence of an employment relationship, as long as the client is the one actually verifying and adjusting the timekeeping information for accuracy.
  • Purchasing Equipment and Supplies – Unlike investments in office space or payroll systems, investments in the tools necessary for caregivers to perform their service by the registry may indicate an employment relationship.
  • Receiving EINs or 1099s – Calling a caregiver an “independent contractor” and issuing an IRS 1099 form does not preclude the caregiver from being an employee for FLSA purposes.

The Bulletin also notes that determining whether a registry is an employer of a caregiver under the FLSA requires a thorough analysis of the registry’s business model and operations. The listed factors are helpful, but they are not exhaustive. Additional facts related to the caregiver’s relationship with the registry may be necessary for a comprehensive analysis.
Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to answer inquiries regarding the Bulletin and other developments.

©2018 Jackson Lewis P.C. This Update is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended as legal advice nor does it create an attorney/client relationship between Jackson Lewis and any readers or recipients. Readers should consult counsel of their own choosing to discuss how these matters relate to their individual circumstances. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the express written consent of Jackson Lewis.

This Update may be considered attorney advertising in some states. Furthermore, prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jackson Lewis P.C. represents management exclusively in workplace law and related litigation. Our attorneys are available to assist employers in their compliance efforts and to represent employers in matters before state and federal courts and administrative agencies. For more information, please contact the attorney(s) listed or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

October 17, 2018

Illinois Joins Growing List of States Addressing Employee Business Expense Reimbursement

October 17, 2018

An amendment to the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act (IWPCA) imposing an affirmative duty on employers to reimburse employees for certain expenses incurred during their employment will go into effect on January 1, 2019. Previous Law Prior to the amendment, expense reimbursements were not addressed in the IWPCA and its... Read More

September 25, 2018

Door-to-Door Salesmen, Chauffeur Drivers Not Entitled to Overtime Pay under ‘Fair Reading’ of FLSA, Second Circuit Finds

September 25, 2018

Acknowledging its obligation to give a “fair reading” to all Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime exemptions, as the U.S. Supreme Court stated in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 138 S. Ct. 1134 (2018), in separate cases, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that door-to-door salespersons for an energy supply... Read More

September 24, 2018

Time Spent in Security Screening Compensable under Laws of Nevada and Arizona, Federal Court Rules

September 24, 2018

The laws of Nevada and Arizona require employers to pay their workers for time spent going through security screenings at the end of their shifts, the federal appeals court in Cincinnati has ruled. Busk et al. v. Integrity Staffing Solutions et al., Nos. 17-5784 and 17-5785 (6th Cir. Sept. 19, 2018). While the U.S. Supreme Court held... Read More