Search form

Jonathan Spitz Comments on Implications of the Recent 6th Circuit Ruling in Hendrickson USA, LLC v. NLRB

  • August 13, 2019
  • From SHRM

Jonathan Spitz comments on the implications of the recent ruling in Hendrickson USA, LLC v. NLRB, where the NLRB incorrectly found that an employer's statements to workers during unionization efforts were coercive in "Employer’s Statements Against Unionizing Were Not Coercive," published by SHRM. 

Subscription may be required to view article 

Mentioned

Practices

People

See AllRelated News

November 1, 2019
Jackson Lewis

Jackson Lewis Earns Tier 1 Rankings on 2020 "Best Law Firms" List

November 1, 2019

NEW YORK, NY (November 1, 2019) Jackson Lewis P.C., one of the country’s preeminent workplace law firms, is pleased to announce the firm has earned “National Tier 1” rankings for the following practice areas in the 2020 U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” list: Employment Law - Management Labor Law - Management... Read More

October 31, 2019
GlobalAutoIndustry.com

James Stone and Jim Verdi Discuss Implications of Mexico’s New Labor Laws

October 31, 2019

James Stone and Jim Verdi discuss the implications of Mexico’s new labor laws and their evolving impact on current union organizing efforts in “Mexico’s New Labor Laws: Union Organizing and New Regulations Increase Challenges for US Automotive Companies,” published by GlobalAutoIndustry.com. Subscription may be required to view... Read More

September 3, 2019
SHRM

Philip Rosen, Jonathan Spitz and James Verdi Author "Mexico’s Overhaul of Federal Labor Laws: Updates, Timelines for Employers"

September 3, 2019

Philip Rosen, Jonathan Spitz and James Verdi author "Mexico’s Overhaul of Federal Labor Laws: Updates, Timelines for Employers," published by SHRM. Subscription may be required to view article Read More