Search form

Connecticut Releases Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Guidance

By Tanya A. Bovée, Margaret J. Strange and Russell N. Jarem
  • October 7, 2019

The Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (CHRO) has released sexual harassment prevention training in accordance with the Time’s Up Act.

The Act requires employers of all sizes to provide sexual harassment training to supervisors by October 1, 2020 (or within six months of hire, after that date). Employers with at least three employees must provide this training to all other employees, not only supervisors, also by October 1, 2020 (or within six months of hire, after that date).

The CHRO also has offered additional guidance on implementing the new law.

(For details of the Act, see our article, Connecticut Expands Harassment Training and Posting Obligations for Employers.)

The new guidance makes clear that the scope of the Act is intended to reach any employer that employs any individual in Connecticut, provided it also employs at least three employees in total, regardless of location. In other words, an employer with only one employee in Connecticut and at least two employees in other states must comply with the Act’s notification and training requirements.

While the Act was silent on whether the training requirements would be applied to current employees, the CHRO has taken the position that current employees must complete the required training within one year, or by October 1, 2020. The Act requires that all new employees complete training within six months of their start date.

Most employers will be required to supplement their sexual harassment policies and distribute them in the manner required by the statute, as well as offer training to their employees. The CHRO has developed free training and posters that may be distributed. However, as expected, the free training is purposefully generic — providing identical training to management and subordinate employees — and addresses public accommodation and housing discrimination issues (which would not apply to most employers). More important, to the extent that an employer has its own process for receiving and investigating complaints, the free training cannot address that. Rather, it directs the complainant, generally, to report the claim to a supervisor or seek additional assistance from the CHRO directly (which may involve encouraging an employee to file a complaint with the CHRO).

Employers with employees in Connecticut should consult with employment counsel to determine whether they are in compliance with both the Act’s training and notification requirements. Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney if you have any questions.

©2019 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 8, 2019

New Puerto Rico Law Limits Employers’ Use of Credit Reports in Employment Decisions

November 8, 2019

Puerto Rico has enacted legislation to limit the use of credit reports in making employment decisions. An “Act to Protect Employee’s Credit Information” (PR Act. No. 150 of October 8, 2019) prohibits employers from refusing to hire, dismissing, or otherwise discriminating against an employee or applicant because of the information in... Read More

November 5, 2019

Religious Accommodation and Patient Safety in Healthcare Industry

November 5, 2019

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires employers in the healthcare industry to provide a reasonable accommodation to employees’ sincerely held religious beliefs and practices. Common accommodation requests relate to: Exemptions from the flu vaccination Time off for Sabbath observance or to attend religious services Prayer... Read More

October 15, 2019

Third-Party Harassment and Discrimination: The Customer Isn’t Always Right

October 15, 2019

As fiscal year 2019 ends for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), it has announced it is pursuing several new discrimination suits, including one alleging a casino failed to protect female staffers from sexual harassment by patrons. Sexual misconduct and harassment have been in the national spotlight more than ever and... Read More

Related Practices