Search form

Kentucky Employers Must Be Represented by Counsel in Unemployment Compensation Hearings, Court Rules

By Patricia Anderson Pryor, Katharine C. Weber and Jamie M. Goetz-Anderson
  • May 7, 2019

Non-lawyers may no longer represent employers in unemployment compensation hearings in Kentucky, the Kentucky Court of Appeals has ruled. Nichols v. Kentucky Unemployment Commission, et al., No. 2017-CA-001156-MR, 2019 Ky. App. LEXIS 73 (Ky Ct. App. Apr. 26, 2019).

The Court held the section of the Kentucky unemployment compensation statute that permits an employer to represent itself and authorizes a non-lawyer managerial representative to represent the corporation in administrative proceedings before the unemployment commission (KRS 341.470(3)) violates the Kentucky Constitution because it constitutes the unauthorized practice of law. Therefore, if an employer is not an individual or sole proprietor, it must be represented by counsel at any hearing or proceeding before the Kentucky Unemployment Commission.

Background

After he was terminated by his employer, Michael Nichols filed for unemployment compensation benefits. The Unemployment Commission originally determined that Nichols was disqualified from benefits. He appealed and an administrative hearing was held before the referee. The employer was represented at the hearing by the manager who had supervised Nichols and terminated his employment. The Commission affirmed the denial of benefits following the hearing. Nichols appealed to the Jefferson Circuit Court, which also affirmed the denial of benefits.

On appeal to the Kentucky Court of Appeals, Nichols argued (among other things) that the proceedings before the Commission were unconstitutional due to the non-attorney manager’s appearance at the hearing.

Statute Unconstitutional

On review, the Court of Appeals explained that the statute, at KRS 341.470(3)(a), expressly authorizes “any employer” to represent itself or be represented by counsel in a proceeding before the referee or Commission. It also explained that KRS 341.470(3)(b) similarly authorizes a managerial representative to represent a corporation or partnership employer in a proceeding before the referee or the Commission.

While an individual employer or sole proprietorship had the right to represent itself in any administrative or legal proceedings, the Court of Appeals held that KRS 341.470(3) was unconstitutional as applied to any other employers because it violates the separation of powers provisions of the Kentucky Constitution by permitting the unauthorized practice of law.

The Court reversed the decision of the Jefferson Circuit Court and remanded the action back to the Commission to hold a new hearing in which the employer was represented by counsel.

The Court decision is prospective only. It will not invalidate decisions resulting from hearings that occurred prior to its issuance.

Implications

The Court’s decision overturns decades of standard practice in Kentucky and will increase employers’ cost to challenge an unemployment claim. Kentucky employers should retain counsel for any future Kentucky unemployment compensation hearings.

Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney with any questions about this case or other workplace laws.

©2019 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

November 13, 2019

Healthcare Employers’ Title VII Obligations in Harassment, Discrimination of Employees by Patients

November 13, 2019

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires healthcare employers to protect their medical staff and employees from harassment and discrimination and respond to any such behaviors swiftly and effectively, even if the actor is a patient, rather than a coworker or supervisor. A decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit... Read More

October 18, 2019

Pay the Piper – California Employers Pressed to Pay Arbitration Fees or Risk Harsh Consequences

October 18, 2019

California employers may face harsh consequences for failing to pay arbitration fees on time under a bill (Senate Bill 707) signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on October 13, 2019. The new law goes into effect on January 1, 2020. Under the new law, if an employer fails to pay fees required for the commencement or continuation of an... Read More

October 15, 2019

New California Law Attacks Mandatory Arbitration Again … But Is It More Bark Than Bite?

October 15, 2019

California has joined a number of states in passing legislation purporting to prohibit mandatory arbitration agreements for sexual harassment and other claims. Such laws have gained popularity in the wake of the #MeToo movement, but are subject to challenge under Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preemption principles. (See our articles... Read More

Related Practices