Search form

California Worker Misclassification Bill Closer to Enactment

By Susan E. Groff, Ted Nick Kazaglis, Suellen Oswald, Cepideh Roufougar and Jonathan A. Siegel
  • September 13, 2019

The California Assembly has passed a bill that would require workers to be classified as employees if the employer exerts control over how the workers perform their tasks or if their work is part of the employer’s regular business.

Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) passed by a vote of 61-16 in the Assembly. Governor Gavin Newsom has stated his support of the bill and is expected to sign it into law. Then the new law will go into effect on January 1, 2020.

Background

Section 1(e) of AB 5 declares:

the intent of the Legislature in enacting this act to ensure workers who are currently exploited by being misclassified as independent contractors instead of recognized as employees have the basic rights and protections they deserve under the law, including a minimum wage, workers’ compensation if they are injured on the job, unemployment insurance, paid sick leave, and paid family leave. By codifying the California Supreme Court’s landmark, unanimous Dynamex decision, this act restores these important protections to potentially several million workers who have been denied these basic workplace rights that all employees are entitled to under the law.

AB 5 would codify and clarify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County. In Dynamex, the Court adopted the “ABC Test” for determining whether an individual is an employee or independent contractor under the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) Wage Orders, abandoning the multi-factor test established in S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 48 Cal.3d 341 (1989).

Under the ABC test, to establish that an individual is in fact an independent contractor, an employer must prove that:

(A) The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact;

(B) The person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and

(C) The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

Part B of the test is particularly problematic for some industries, especially those with established business models dependent on the use of contractors.

Bill Extends ABC Test

AB 5 extends the ABC test to the California Labor Code and the Unemployment Insurance Code. It also changes how an “employee” is defined in California. Under AB 5:

a person providing labor or services for remuneration shall be considered an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that the person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, the person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business, and the person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business.

Exemptions from ABC Test for Certain Industries, Positions

The legislature has attempted to codify in AB 5 exemptions from the ABC test for certain industries, professions, and positions. (See our blog posts, Assembly Bill Codifying Dynamex Moves Forward, with Notable Exemptions and AB 5 Returned to the CA Senate.)

AB 5 may provide that the multi-factor Borello test (and not the ABC test) applies to certain occupations. Exemptions from the ABC test could include:

  1. A person or organization licensed by the Department of Insurance;
  2. A physician and surgeon, dentist, podiatrist, psychologist, or veterinarian licensed by the State of California pursuant to Division 2 (commencing with Section 500) of the Business and Professions Code, performing professional or medical services provided to or by a health care entity, including an entity organized as a sole proprietorship, partnership, or professional corporation as defined in Section 13401 of the Corporations Code;
  3. An individual who holds an active license from the State of California and is practicing one of the following recognized professions: lawyer, architect, engineer, private investigator, or accountant;
  4. A securities broker-dealer or investment adviser or their agents and representatives that are registered with the SEC or FINRA or licensed by the state;
  5. A direct salesperson under Unemployment Insurance Code § 650 (a licensed salesperson whose compensation is directly tied to the sale, such as a real estate salesperson);
  6. A real estate licensee;
  7. A commercial fisherman;
  8. A worker providing licensed barber or cosmetology services; and
  9. Others performing work under a contract for professional services, with another business entity, or pursuant to a subcontract in the construction industry.

Under AB 5, the Borello test would govern any independent contractor who has a contract for “professional services” if:

  1. The individual maintains a business location, which may include the individual’s residence, that is separate from the hiring entity;
  2. The individual has a business license, in addition to any required professional licenses or permits for the individual to practice in their profession;
  3. The individual has the ability to set or negotiate their own rates for the services performed;
  4. Outside of project completion dates and reasonable business hours, the individual has the ability to set their own hours;
  5. The individual is customarily engaged in the same type of work performed under contract with another hiring entity or holds themselves out to other potential customers as available to perform the same type of work; and
  6. The individual customarily and regularly exercises discretion and independent judgment in the performance of the services.

AB 5 outlines a list of services that include marketing, human resources, graphic design, among others.

AB 5 also states that if a court rules the ABC test cannot be applied to a certain situation, then the determination of employee or independent contractor status should be conducted under the Borello test.

***

AB 5 likely will make it harder for companies with business models that rely on “gig workers” and many other industries to continue to classify their workers as independent contractors. How employees and independent contractors are defined in California will undergo significant changes when AB 5 becomes law. These companies may have to consider changing their business models or adopting other creative options to avoid having to reclassify contractors as employees.

In addition, AB 5’s extensive definitions for “professional services” and other terms are worth a close reading to determine coverage or exemption. Finally, employers that have defined and branded themselves as technology or software companies, for example, and want to continue to rely on independent contractors may have to make their case in court.

We will continue to monitor and provide updates on AB 5. Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to discuss the bill and to assist employers in determining whether and how their particular business will be affected.

©2019 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

October 18, 2019

Pay the Piper – California Employers Pressed to Pay Arbitration Fees or Risk Harsh Consequences

October 18, 2019

California employers may face harsh consequences for failing to pay arbitration fees on time under a bill (Senate Bill 707) signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on October 13, 2019. The new law go into effect on January 1, 2020. Under the new law, if an employer fails to pay fees required for the commencement or continuation of an... Read More

October 15, 2019

New California Law Attacks Mandatory Arbitration Again … But Is It More Bark Than Bite?

October 15, 2019

California has joined a number of states in passing legislation purporting to prohibit mandatory arbitration agreements for sexual harassment and other claims. Such laws have gained popularity in the wake of the #MeToo movement, but are subject to challenge under Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preemption principles. (See our articles... Read More

October 10, 2019

California Consumer Privacy Act FAQs for Covered Businesses

October 10, 2019

Set to take effect January 1, 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), considered one of the most expansive U.S. privacy laws to date, places limitations on the collection and sale of a consumer’s personal information and provides consumers certain rights with respect to their personal information. Organizations should be... Read More

Related Practices