Search form

New California Law Allows Sharing of Home Care Aides’ Contact Information with Unions on Demand

By Elizabeth H. Murphy, Chad P. Richter and JaVon A. Payton
  • July 19, 2019

A controversial amendment to the California Home Care Services Protection Act (Home Care Act) requires the state Department of Social Services (DSS) to provide the names, phone numbers, and addresses of new or renewing registered home care aides (HCAs) to labor unions on request, unless the aides opt out.

The new law, which raises concerns over privacy rights, became effective on July 1, 2019.

Home Care Act

The Home Care Act (section 1796.29 of the California Health and Safety Code) requires the DSS to create and maintain a registry of HCAs on its website. The registry comprises the registration status, the registration expiration date, and, if applicable, the home care organization with which the HCA is associated.

Section 1796.29 also permits the DSS to collect a variety of private identifiable information (PII) about HCAs, which can include names, addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers, as well as educational, financial, medical, and employment history data. This information is not publicly available on the DSS website.

Amendment to the Home Care Act (AB 2455)

The amendment, AB 2455, added to section 1796.29 a “carve out” for labor unions that allows them to obtain HCAs’ names, phone numbers, and addresses from DSS.

Labor unions may use an HCA’s name, phone number, and address obtained from DSS for organizing, representation, and assistance activities only. This information may not be disclosed to any other individual or entity. The Home Care Act prohibits an HCA’s PII from being published on the internet.

Under AB 2455, HCAs may prohibit the DSS from sharing their information by completing the “opt out” portion of the registration procedures when they register on the DSS website.

Privacy Rights

Under federal and state law, HCAs have the right to protect their PII. The Home Care Association of America (HCAOA) and the California Association for Health Services at Home (CAHSAH) commenced suit against the State of California on July 3, arguing that AB 2455 is unconstitutional because it compromises HCAs’ privacy rights.

Although AB 2455 allows HCAs who do not want their information shared with unions to “opt out,” HCAOA and CAHSAH argue that HCAs likely will not do so because it would require an HCA to complete an extra step in the registration process. They argue that HCAs may choose not to “opt out” simply to avoid this extra step, unaware they may be compromising their privacy rights.

Union Organizing Activity

AB 2455 likely will increase union organizing efforts across the state in this industry. With ready access to HCAs’ names, phone numbers, and addresses, unions can contact them to convince them to support a union in their workplaces.

AB 2455 also could result in increased unfair labor practice litigation before the National Labor Relations Board for, e.g., unlawful employer interference with employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act. Unions may allege, with or without merit, employers required or pressured HCAs to opt out of providing their names, phone numbers, and addresses to unions.

Home care employers should consult legal counsel before considering advising applicants or employees on their opt-out and privacy rights.

***

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to assist employers with this and other workplace issues.

©2019 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

August 21, 2019

Labor Board Corrects ‘Unjustified Asymmetry’ in Anticipatory Withdrawal of Union Recognition Doctrine

August 21, 2019

Since 2001, an employer presented with evidence that at least 50 percent of its unionized bargaining unit no longer wanted to be represented by the union could anticipatorily withdraw recognition from that union. The union, however, could rebut that evidence by showing that, subsequent to the employer’s pronouncement and prior to the... Read More

August 20, 2019

Supreme Court’s Epic Systems Decision on Arbitration Interpreted Broadly by Labor Board

August 20, 2019

An employer may lawfully issue to its employees a new or revised mandatory arbitration agreement containing a class- and collective-action waiver specifying that employment disputes are to be resolved by individualized arbitration, even if it was in response to employees opting into a collective action (such as a wage lawsuit), the... Read More

August 15, 2019

Top Five Labor Law Developments for July 2019

August 15, 2019

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel’s Division of Advice has found an employer did not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it fired an employee based on the mistaken belief that she divulged confidential wage information. Centura, 27-CA-234214 (Adv. Mem. June 24, 2019, released July 16, 2019). As... Read More

Related Practices