Search form

Mark S. Askanas

Principal
San Francisco

P 415-394-9400
F 415-394-9401
Mark.Askanas@jacksonlewis.com

Biography

Mark S. Askanas is a Principal in the San Francisco, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He joined the firm in 1988 and is a senior employment law litigator who has served as lead counsel for cases in state and federal courts, as well as arbitration forums, throughout the western United States.

Mr. Askanas specializes in complex litigation, including class actions and cases involving trade secrets and confidential information. He also counsels employers on all facets of employment law including, but not limited to, wage and hour issues and best preventive employment practices. He regularly speaks throughout the United States to employer groups and trade associations on these and other topics.

Mr. Askanas also has substantial in-house experience having served as General Counsel of a Fortune 500 company where he worked closely with the board of directors, audit committee, and senior management managing risk and advising on legal developments and issues, including Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, corporate governance, transactional matters, and preventive nationwide litigation and class action avoidance strategies.

Honors and Recognitions

  • Who's Who Legal (2006-2007)

Published Works

  • “Retailers Beware: Statements May Not Be Protected,” Employment Law 360 (April 19, 2010)
  • "Strict Liability in Sexual Harassment: Too Strict a Standard," California Employment Law Journal .12 (December 1997, Assisted in Updating Chapters)
  • "Sexual Harassment in the Physician Workplace," California Physician (April 1991)

See AllPublications

Advanced Filtering
Showing 1-3 of 13
Newest
Most Read
January 2, 2019

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Winter 2019

January 2, 2019

Class Action Trends Report The latest issue of our quarterly report on developments in class action litigation focuses on “joint employers” and covers the following topics: Are you my employer? A patchwork of tests Only in California Prevention pointer Read the Report … OSHA: Certain Safety Incentive Programs, Post... Read More

September 26, 2018

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Fall 2018

September 26, 2018

Supreme Court Preview: 2018-2019 Term The U.S. Supreme Court’s docket for its 2018-2019 Term is full of cases significant to employers and businesses. Cases to watch involve questions on employment discrimination and class arbitration, among other things. Read full article … New Model Background Check Summary of Rights Released... Read More

June 25, 2018

Retail Industry Workplace Law Update – Summer 2018

June 25, 2018

Supreme Court Approves Use of Class Action Waivers in Employment Arbitration Agreements The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) does not bar class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled. Such waivers are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).  Read full article…... Read More

Showing 1-3 of 13

See AllBlog Posts by Mark S. Askanas

What California Retail Employers Need to Know About Accommodating Pregnancy
January 29, 2016

Navigating the California laws on discrimination and accommodation of pregnant employees is a significant challenge for retail employers. The Golden State’s protections for pregnant employees are many and they differ from those of federal law and of other states. Read More

By Mark S. Askanas and Rebecca Benhuri

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects California Limitation on Arbitration Agreements with Class Action Waivers
December 29, 2015

Despite recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions strongly upholding the enforceability of class action waivers in arbitration agreements, opposition to class action waivers on both the political and legal fronts persists, especially in California. Read More

By Mark S. Askanas and James A. McKenna

California Court Holds Arbitrator Decides Class Arbitrability Where Agreement Specifies AAA Rules
August 26, 2015

An employment arbitration agreement that incorporated the American Arbitration Association’s National Rules for the Resolution of Employment Disputes vested the arbitrator with the power to decide whether the agreement authorized class-wide relief, the California Court of Appeal has ruled. Universal Protection Service LP v. Read More