Skip to main content

Anne Bensky Spotlighted on Employment Law Powerlist

Anne Bensky is spotlighted for her unique educational background and commitment to providing strategic and preventative legal counsel to her clients in “Wisconsin Law Journal's 2024 Employment Law Powerlist” published by the Wisconsin Law Journal. 

Subscription may be required to view article 

Courtney Malveaux Comments on Potential Changes in Wage and Hour Litigation Post-Chevron Decision

Courtney Malveaux comments on how the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron ruling will impact the DOL's defense and implementation of wage and hour regulations in litigation in “Justices' Chevron Ruling Threatens DOL Wage Rulemaking,” published by Law360. 

Subscription may be required to view article 

Andrew Maunz Comments on Post-Chevron Changes in DOL and EEOC Regulatory and Litigation Strategies

Andrew Maunz comments on the potential for federal agencies like the U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to lean more on litigation to set policy and strategically defend their legal positions on labor and employment issues in the absence of Chevron deference in “Labor Enforcers’ Policy Strategies Will Get Post-Chevron Rewrite,” published by Bloomberg Law.

Subscription may be required to view article 

Jackson Lewis Advances 12 Spots on The American Lawyer's 2024 Diversity Scorecard

NEW YORK, NY (June 28, 2024) – Nationwide employment law firm Jackson Lewis P.C. is pleased to announce the firm has secured the #14 spot on The American Lawyer’s Diversity Scorecard, marking a significant rise of 12 places from its 2023 ranking.

Richard Vitarelli Discusses NLRB’s 2023 Joint Employer Rule and Legal Challenges Leading to Its Repeal

Richard Vitarelli discusses the National Labor Relations Board’s 2023 Joint Employer Rule and the ongoing litigation, which led to the rule's vacatur, alongside Jordan Von Bokern from the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center in “Podcast on National Labor Relations Board Joint Employer Rule,” published by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Subscription may be required to listen to the podcast

Scott Jang Comments on PAGA Reform Bills’ Impact on Plaintiffs

Scott Jang comments that the PAGA reform changes will only apply to cases filed after June 19, 2024 and suggests that this may have triggered the uptick in filings by plaintiff attorneys since the PAGA reform was announced in “Plaintiff attorneys miss deadline for PAGA filings,” published by the Daily Journal. 

Subscription may be required to view article 

Jackson Lewis Places 51st on the 2024 NLJ 500

Jackson Lewis ranks 51st on the 2024 NLJ 500, recognized as one of the largest U.S. law firms by employee count, offering an annual overview of its growth and changes in "The 2024 NLJ 500: Ranked by Head Count," published by Law.com.

Subscription may be required to view article

Justin Barnes Discusses Supreme Court’s Review of Overtime Exemption Proof Standards

Justin Barnes discusses how the Supreme Court’s decision will impact how companies assess the risk of classifying workers as exempt from overtime and emphasizes how crucial meeting the required evidentiary standard will be for employers if an exemption status is challenged in “Justices’ Look at Overtime Exemption Proof Raises Liability Risk,” published by Bloomberg Law. 

Subscription may be required to view article 

Justin Barnes Discusses Cost Concerns Ahead of Supreme Court Overtime Exemption Decision

Justin Barnes discusses the potential financial relief for employers if the Supreme Court standardizes the proof required for FLSA overtime exemptions, suggesting that a consistent standard could reduce legal and financial risks for businesses nationwide who are found in violation of the FLSA in “Upcoming Supreme Court Decision May Make HR’s Exemption Analysis Less Costly,” published by SHRM. 

Subscription may be required to view article 

Michelle Phillips Comments on the Impact of Recent Religious Discrimination Cases on Legal Precedents

Michelle Phillips comments on the district court’s decision to mandate “religious liberty training”, arguing the order exceeds the scope of the court's civil-contempt authority and that such training decisions should be left to attorneys, aligning with EEOC standards in “4 Discrimination Cases To Watch In 2nd Half Of 2024,” published by Law360. 

Subscription may be required to view article 

Subscribe to