Search form

New York City Commission on Human Rights Issues Mandatory Sexual Harassment Notice and Fact Sheet

By Lori D. Bauer, Richard I. Greenberg and Daniel J. Jacobs
  • August 8, 2018

The New York City Commission on Human Rights has released a fact sheet and mandatory posting consistent with the “Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act.” Effective September 6, 2018, all New York City employers must conspicuously post the anti-sexual harassment rights and responsibilities posting, as well as hand out the fact sheet to new employees at the time of hire.

The Commission’s dedicated webpage includes other resources about sexual harassment, such as sample scenarios to help identify discrimination in the workplace and information on bystander intervention.

The law, signed by Mayor Bill de Blasio on May 9, 2018, also requires employers with at least 15 employees to conduct annual anti-sexual harassment training for all employees, starting April 1, 2019. For more information on the enacted New York City legislative package related to harassment, see our articles, New York City Enacts Anti-Sexual Harassment Legislation that Includes Training Requirement, New York City Council Passes Legislative Package Aimed at Preventing Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, and New York City Legislation Would Mandate Sexual Harassment Training, Expand Employer Coverage under Human Rights Law.

Additionally, New York City employers must comply with the upcoming statewide sexual harassment training mandate applicable to management and employees. See our article, New York Legislature Passes Significant Changes to Laws Combating Sexual Harassment in the Workplace, for details of this requirement and related pieces of legislation. We continue to monitor updates from the state regarding the promulgation of a model policy and model training materials.

Please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney with any questions related to harassment policies, training, and other preventive practices.

©2018 Jackson Lewis P.C. This material is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create a client-lawyer relationship between Jackson Lewis and any recipient. Recipients should consult with counsel before taking any actions based on the information contained within this material. This material may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Reproduction of this material in whole or in part is prohibited without the express prior written consent of Jackson Lewis P.C., a law firm that built its reputation on providing workplace law representation to management. Founded in 1958, the firm has grown to more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries including government relations, healthcare and sports law. More information about Jackson Lewis can be found at www.jacksonlewis.com.

See AllRelated Articles You May Like

December 13, 2019

Restaurant Industry Workplace Law Update – Fall 2019

December 13, 2019

To assist restaurant owners and professionals in assessing emerging employment risks, we are pleased to provide the first issue of our newsletter. The Restaurant Industry Workplace Law Update highlights topical issues in claims, defenses, and liability risk management developments. Supreme Court’s Epic Systems Decision on Arbitration... Read More

December 12, 2019

House Seeks to Block Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations

December 12, 2019

Four congresspersons have introduced legislation in the House of Representatives aiming to block the Department of Education’s proposed amendments to the Title IX regulations on how colleges and universities must handle allegations of sexual misconduct from taking effect. The bill, introduced on December 10, 2019, would prohibit... Read More

December 12, 2019

California Bar on Mandatory Arbitration Agreements in Employment Challenged, Injunction Sought

December 12, 2019

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business organizations have filed suit in federal court against the State of California to have AB 51 declared preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Becerra, No. 2:19-cv-2456 KJM DB. Alternatively, the lawsuit seeks a declaration that AB 51’s... Read More